|
Disclaimer & Bowles DNA Project |
The
Whitshed family recorded Thomas Sr. as Captain Boules who married Mary
Plunket (see the Whitshed/Plunket reference below) and his burial record
lists him as Captain Thomas Bolds.
Their
son Thomas Jr's burial was recorded as Mr Boulds. Thomas Jr's son
Charles baptismal entry was spelled Bould.
Their
daughter Hester was baptized as Bould in 1655 but her marriage in 1683
records her as Bowles. After that I couldn't find the Bowles
spelling in an original document until the
Deed Memorials involving
his grandchildren starting in 1715.
I
can't find any original source references for a Bowles spelling actually
in Dublin that early.
However, while Bowles may not have been known,
the Bould spelling was well known in Dublin before Thomas arrived.
The Dublin Assembly Roll of 1646 lists a Daniel
Bould who was newly admitted to the city upon having served his
apprenticeship as a goldsmith and paying a fine (a fee). Due to
the severe lack of coinage in Dublin local goldsmiths would issue their
own trade tokens one of which issued between 1650 and 1679 which
displayed a winged beast was issued by Roger Bold of Skinner's Row.
The Pender Census taken in 1659, which was actually not a census just a
list of people occupying land, lists a Roger Bould holding land in
Dublin. An undated document from the Marquis of Ormonde's
collection covering the period 1662-1684 includes a Roger Bould in a
list of men in the King's Regiment of Guards in Ireland. In that
same collection there is also a manscript dated March 31, 1665 for a
recovery of debt from John Pollexfen of Colonel Brent Moore's company of
the Royal Regiment filed by Thomas Hoocke, Roger Bold and Benjamin
Bunbury and a manuscript dated June 14, 1665 for an affidavit of service
order in which Benjamin Bunbury, Roger Bold and Gorman Humphreyes were
the paintiffs.

However, the transcription made of the St
Brides Dublin church register has an Edmund Bowles son of Roger Bowles
bp. July 10, 1664. The original probably has Bould although I
haven't been able to check that yet.
So the spelling of the surnames was all quite
random, had little importance at the time (even Wills show variations)
and should not be used to follow a family line.