Disclaimer & Bowles DNA Project |
Reference
M13/5/2/7
Title
Draft notes compiled by G.H. Fowler. Including notes on age
qualifications for inheriting land in medieval England and the genealogy of
the family de Bouelles (Boeles, Buelles, Boweles).
Date free text
no date c1925
Production date
From: 1920 To: 1925
Dr. G. H. Fowler’s notes on the inquisition in 1283
on John de Boweles of Bedfordshire’s right to inherit his father’s land
(notes made about 1925) (16 pages)
The family of de Bouelles (Boeles, Buelles, Boweles)
presumably came from the village of that name near Neufchatel in the
Department of Seine Inferieure.
Though never of importance, its members occur often in this county during
the xiii and xiv century and this inquisition called for an attempt to clear
them up. Henry de B whose
parentage has not been traced is the first to appear as holding land in
Bedfordshire. He attested the
foundation charter of Newenham Priory (Cartul. Newenham, folio 150, no, 224)
passed by Simon de Beauchamp of Bedford
(in 1166/67) and thus was in the county before his marriage; as he
attested other charters of both Simon and his son William de Beauchamp and
later held land from the Bedford barony in Ravensden, Stagsden, Ren..., and
S...pho. He may be regarded as
a knight of that honour but does not appear in the return of its knights (
.... 319-322) (in 1166. He
married between 1185 and 1190 Auda, daughter of Hugh de Beauchamp of Eaton
Socon and Philippa de Trailly (... , 68-72) she being widow of William (page
B2) Maubanc (d. before 1185) of Wich Malbank or Nantwich; with her came land
at Southill (the manor of Roxton (her mother’s marriage portion) from the
Trailly share (... xi, 21, 41 and P/1) of the honour of Wardon.
In 1200 a vivid story (R.C.R ii, 158) records how Henry caused to be
brought before him from Aylesbury gaol one Walketin a thief to whom he
promised life and limb if he would show where he had hidden the money;
Walketin was taken to his own house by Henry and his sister where he asked
for a sword or knife; when these were naturally refused to him, he bade them
dig in front of the settle (?) of an inner room and the money was then
found. Henry is here called the
Sheriff and was (page B3) clearly acting in that capacity, but was probably
Under Sheriff since the C Dep Sh (county deputy sheriffs?) at that time are
known. He with his wife gave
land at Stanford (in Southill) to the nuns of Chicksand (.... , I, 114) to
buy themselves linen, and he appears in suits for land in Southill Wootton
and Ravensden. In the last
record noted of him he (Bk. J. 1452; ..... , ii, 252) was assessor of the
carricage (?) of Beds in 1220.
He had acquired also (.... , vi, 35; xi, 58) by 1206 some land at T..vey,
apparently by purchase. Auda de
Beauchamp was still a widow in 1190, when order was given (P.R.S., n.s., I,
17) for her dower; she gave land to Stow priory (Mon. Angl. Vi, 233) at
Laudon (?), co. Staffordshire, a Maubanc manor, for the souls of her late
husband and her heir Hugh
(note: Hugh de Maubanc); the latter must have died young because the
Maubanc property was divided amongst heiresses.
page B3 back
Henry however was not the first of his name in this
county; Simon de B held (... , folio 52, no 316, folio 88v no 415) the
church of Gravenhurst to which he had been presented by William son of Brien
and admitted by .... Nicholas while the see of Lincoln was vacant (1167-73)
and became the vicar when the church was given to Newenham priory.
p. B4
Henry had (... , xiii, 131; C.R.R., I, 174) three
sons, Robert, Walter and Simon.
Robert who occurs (P.R.S. xiv, 129) in 1203 seems to be the Robert de B who
was put in charge (R. Lit. Pat., 25b) of two Westmoreland castles under
Robert de Vipont, an early connection between the two families.
Walter occurs in a suit for land at Gravenhurst (C. R. R. vi, 82) in
1210. Simon appears as
connected with land at Ravensden and Southill (C.R.R. vii, 72; ...., vi, 43)
in 1214. He is probably the
Simon father of Nicholas named in the Newenham Cartulary (...., fo. 10, d,
.... 221 g) about 1210/20.
Henry had (erased few words) a dau Auda and John his son and heir.
(note: R. Lit. Pat. Would be Rotuli Litterarum
Patentium; this is the reference on page 25 dated 1203 but I cannot read the
Latin; Appleby is Appleby-in-Westmorland; Robert de Veteri-Ponte (Vipont)
was Baron of Appleby and Lord of Westmoreland; Bellocampo is Beauchamp)
p. B5
Auda became Maid of Honour (Domicella Regina) to
Queen Eleanor and 1243 was allowed 10 m yearly at Exch. Till she should
receive land of that value; these were assigned to her for her life in 1248
at Bulwell by Sherwood Forest in which she was permitted (Cal. Pat.,
1232-47, 407; Cal. Chart., I, 335; Cal. Cl. 1247-51, 446) to a... 13 acres.
She is last found in 1252.
p. B6
John de B first appears in 1210 as suing his
half-sister Annora Maubane (C.R.R. vi, 81) for Gr. (or Gl.) Brickhill, co.
Bucks,; the suit has been discussed at some length (.... x, 303) in an
earlier volume. He opposed King
John, and was in Colchester Castle (R. Lib. Pat. 171b) when surrendered in
1217. Under Henry III he was
active in county matters – one of the knights to convey the money raised by
a Fifteenth in 1225. Justice of
Assizes in 1229 and 1234, Escheator in 1232 and Keeper of the Peace in 1242.
In 1242/43 he is returned (B.F., 884, 885) as holding 1 ½ fees in
Roxton from the Trailly fee and 2 virgates in Stagsden from the Honour of
Bedford. With his wife Joan (of
whom nothing but the name has been traced) he gave the mill and fishery at
Roxton
p. B7
to the abbey of Pipewell, co. Northants at a rent
which he released in 1251; he had in 1228 bequeathed his body (Cartule
Pipewell (B.M., Stowe ms, 937)) folio 91, 92v, 115v) for burial.
His attestation as a knight (... xvii, 24) in 1251 is the last record
of him found. At this point the
thread breaks but it is possible that William de Baa who held the 1 ½ fees
at Roxton in right of his wife Anna or Annora (F.A I, 6) in 1286 and Alex
Bosown (?) who held them jointly with this Walter (F.A. I, 15, 18) in
1302/03 and 1316 had married daughters or grand-daughters of John de B, if
one may judge from their entry of claim (... xii, 18 (no. 50), 25 (no. 2))
when land was passing by final conciliation in 1288 and 1280.
Roxton remained with the family of Bosown.
p. B8
A second line, to which the subject of this
inquisition belonged, held in Little (Nether) Gravenhurst with .... (....),
and later also in Wendon. From
the Newenham Cartulary (NC 216v
1165, 1166; 121v 628, 633; 145 785) it seems possible that Simon the brother
of Henry de B was the son of Juliana sister of William son of Rob Brian of
Gravenhurst and Milton Brian and was a sub-tenant (C.R.O. vii, 72;
H III vi, 43) in Gravenhurst and Ravensden; he occurs 1200-1214.
His son Nicholas was also sub-tenant (NC 221 f, 221
g) in Stagsden R..hold (Ravensden, presumably under his cousin John de B;
but in 1242/43 is returned (B.F. 887) as joint tenant with 1 fee and ½ fee
at Gravenhurst which had apparently been split off from the Brian holding
there and became known later as Bowels Manor, held of the (maybe Priory) of
Bedford, he owns from about 1210/20 to 1242/43.
Peter de B who succeeded him was presumably his son; he exchanged
land at Gravenhurst with Ramsey Abbey (A.D., A. 127) in 1254/67.
By his marriage to Mary daughter of Walter de Stukeley (H III xi, 42
and pedigree 1) he acquired an interest in the honour of Wake of Wardon;
Peter died (Cal Pet 1272-81, 43) in 1274, his heir and land at Gravenhurst
and Wardon being assigned to Thomas Inge.
John his son proved his age by the present inquisition in 1283 and in
1284/86.
p. B9
this eventually brought to the family half the manor
of Wardon, Landsel (?), T..thil (?) and Hyworth and the manor of Favendish.
The latter of which the early history has long been obscure, was held
from Alina Wake (Bh.T. 867) in 1242/43 and later (F.A. i, 11; Cal. i.p.m.,
viii, 435) from the Honour of Wardon and John de B.
These entries add an unrecognized manor to the honour.
They also seem to show William Spech (Espec) of 1086 from whose
Domesday estate the honour was derived, as the ‘William’ followed by a blank
space for his surname whose sole holding was entered as 2h at Favendish
(D.B. fo. 216) and who has long been a puzzle.
Since the great baron William Peveril held Dorchester to the north of
Favendish as well as land in Favendish itself and in P(?)odington and
William Spech held Wi..ington and Hinwick to the East and south the scribe
did not know which William should be entered for those two hides and left a
blank accordingly
+ this suggestion involves an alteration of the
relevant sentence in H III 41v mem i par. 25
p. B10
is returned (F.A. i, 6) as holding the fee in Wardor
jointly with his cousin William le Quoynte.
In 1299 he was summoned (H III ii, 259) to Carlisle for the
expedition against the Scots, received a grant (Cal. Chart. iii 110) of
market and fair at Wardon and of free warren at Gravenhurst in 1308, and
died (Cal. Fin iv, 387) in 1334.
p. B11
There is also a branch of the family at Holwell, now
part of Herts. In 1086 the
abbey of Ramsey had a manor here, which is entirely neglected by V.C.H.; in
the middle of the xiiith century.
3 ½ hides of this were held by William de Beauchamp of Bedford (Cart.
Rames (R.S. ) i,
459; iii, 212) and 2 hides in Little Holwell by William de Holewell.
The latter holding remains distinct; we can therefore place with
probability on the Beauchamp land Nicholas de B., who was impleaded (R Lit.
Cl. i 376b) in 1218 for throwing down a bridge at Fageswell in Holwell; he
may be, probably was, identical with his contemporary Nicholas son of Simon
de B of Gravenhurst. By 1272 he
had been succeeded (Ass. R. 6, mem
no. ) by
Adam son of Nicholas de B who is returned for 3/8 the fee at Holwell (F.A.
i, 5) in 1284/86 and leased rents there (A. D. iv, A 8776) in 1294.
In 1302/03 the holding at Holwell of a second Nicholas de B was
returned (F.A. i 13) as 1/18th fee, held from Ramsey Abbey.
p. B12
A Edelsborough in county Bucks a John de B appears
(F.A. i, 74) as holding ½ fee in 1284/86, who is not his contemporary John
of Gravenhurst and Wardon but seems to be past tenant of a fee (F.A. ii,
153, 175) at Shellow Bowells co. Essex in 1303.
In 1285 he had been imprisoned (Cal. Cl. 1279-88, 314) for forest
trespass in Ess (?). In 1296 he
received a rent from the mill at Edlesborough and in 1297 was about 50 years
old (Cal. Ipm, iii, 206, 323) with a son Adam.
This tenement at Edlesborough was held from Ralph de Beauchamp of
Eaton, and had been granted in chief (H III ii, 75) to Hugh de Beauchamp (iv
E) in the middle of the xiith century; Mr F G Gurney kindly sent me the
transcript of a charter which John de B attested in 1282, and informed me
that the land in Edlesborough, formerly known as Bowells Manor, now belongs
to the Chew foundation at Dunstable.
John died (R ?, Origin. , i. 267) in 1321/22 and by 1346 had been
succeeded (F.A. i, 128, ii, 175) by Stephen de B.
...... Edlesborough Shellow.
Chew foundation:
Chew’s Foundation at Dunstable (collection at Bedfordshire and Luton
Archives)
William Chew was sheriff of Bedfordshire in 1709. In
1703 he obtained a grant of arms with a device of catherine wheels and
griffins' heads which was later to be the badge of the Foundation scholars.
He died unmarried in March, 1712/13, leaving an estate worth £28,000 which
was inherited by his sisters and coheirs Frances Ashton and Jane Cart, and
by Thomas Aynscombe, the son of Elizabeth. The property consisted of
fourteen farms in Dunstable, Luton, Kensworth, Caddington, Gravenhurst and
Edlesborough, the manors of Fitzhugh, Edlesborough, Bowells and Northall
(Bucks.), the two inns and several other cottages and pieces of land in
Dunstable, a house in London, and houses in the parish of St. Sepulchre,
leased to London tradesmen.
p. Ba
Many inquisitions for ‘proof of age’ have been
preserved. In a case when land
was held directly from the king (tenancy in chief) on the death of the
holder his heir became a ward of the Crown, which administered his lands and
arranged his marriage, or sold these privileges to another guardian.
Before the heir could enter upon his land he must prove his age to be
twenty one years and must then pay his ‘relief’ and do homage to the king.
The law recognized more than one qualifying age; for the heir of a
sokerman (?) fifteen years was enough; for the heir of a burgess, the age
when he could (Glanville lib. viii, cap. 9) ‘discreetly (?) reckon money,
measure cloth and similarly carry out other business of his father’.
A girl could consent to marriage at twelve; at fourteen she had
reached years of discretion and might choose a guardian (page Bb) but might
not alienate her land till she was twenty one.
For legal history these proofs of age are interesting as being trials
by witnesses, which for a moment threatened (Pol.(?) Maitl., Hist. Eng. Law,
ii, 634-637) to be a serious rival of trial by jury.